Soli Deo Gloria!

(all glory be to God)

Tag: Jesus

DNC, RNC, God and Politics

Mitt Romney in 2007 in Washington, DC at the V...

Mitt Romney in 2007 in Washington, DC at the Values Voters conference (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Last week there was quite the commotion over the Democratic Party omitting “God” from their party’s current platform. It even reached the level of spectacle when they attempted to reinsert “God” back in on the Convention Floor. They eventually did so, even though the party genuinely appeared split on this issue.

Being politics, this wasn’t the end of the incident. Gleeful Republican commentators pounced on this story as an illustration of how “ungodly” the Democrats are. However, the self-appointed “party of God” has much rotten in its own spiritual house.

But before we turn to the Republicans, let’s look at the Democrats in more detail. Some say that the convention was split 50/50 over support for ‘God’ in the platform. Now, what do we think the level of support would have been if the word”God” was replaced with “Jesus Christ”? I’d guess that the response on the floor would overwhelmingly have been negative!

You see, this is the problem! Our culture grudgingly puts up with this nebulous concept of ‘god’ that can encompass such diverse conceptions of a god as the Triune God of the Bible, Allah, Thor, etc. These various conceptions of god all differ and are at odds with each other!

So it is a sham to have the word God in your platform if you are not going to identify who this God is.

Now, that brings me to the Republicans. The Republicans, as noted earlier were having a virtual field day with this development. But here too, we have a problem. They consider themselves the “godly” party, but I would wonder, what would happen if Jesus Christ were on the party platform instead of this generic “God”? How much smaller would the Republican coalition be? Pretty tiny is my guess.

And on top of all of this, they have chosen Mitt Romney to be the candidate to represent their party. Here is a man whose religion denies the Triune God, denies the Doctrines of Salvation held by the Christian Church, creates new “scriptures” from the imaginations of a convicted con-man (Joseph Smith), and generally is about as brain dead of a religion as one can choose to follow. From a Biblical Perspective, this man is a Heretic. As an aside, I’d love for Romney to show up to a Native American group and try to tell them that according to his religion, that they are all really Israelites!

Fun with Mormonism aside, when we understand the role of the Civil Magistrate – as one who is a deacon of God (Romans 13:4, often translated servant), this becomes much more sobering and even upsetting. As Christians who are living in a Constitutional Republic, God has providentially given us authority over our Civil Magistrates. They rule based upon our assent! And if these men are to be ministers (Romans 13:6) and deacons (Romans 13:4) of God, how can we hand over a heretic to be God’s appointed servant?

Now, I understand that the majority of Civil Magistrates in this current age are probably apostates, pagans, heretics and atheists. But the Christian in the United States has a unique charge, as God has given us the power to appoint the Civil Magistrate through the ballot box.

This is why I think it is very dangerous for us to appoint an avowed heretic who disavows the Lordship of Jesus Christ to rule over us. We potentially will be enabling an enemy of God to rule over us.

Should we pray for the salvation of Mitt Romney and his family? Absolutely. But until Romney repents and turns to the real Jesus Christ and not the imitator found in the Book of Mormon – I will not cast a vote in his favor. My first allegiance is to my King, and it is very clear that neither the Republican or Democratic Parties currently acknowledge His Rule.

Josephus verifies Jesus

The destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem.

The destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem.

I have been reading up on the variety of millennial views as of late. Trying to understand each viewpoint. Early in my Christian life, I had been taught about things like secret raptures, and a variety of other dispensational “Left Behind” style theologies. Actually studying the texts has led me away from these early dispensational views and into the Covenant Theology of the Reformers. But that’s a discussion for another time.

Currently, I am reading “A Case for Amillenialism” by Kim Riddlebarger and his exposition of the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24). He references the Jewish historian Josephus to paint a picture of what happened during the sacking of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in 70 A.D and I was struck by how horrifying it was.

If we hold to the idea of prophetic foreshortening and that the tribulation Jesus describes is both a picture of the tribulation in 70 A.D, as well as the fuller, future tribulation to come. If what the Jews experienced in the 1st Century is merely the type for the Tribulation – then we are in some serious trouble as we prepare for Jesus’ Second Advent. Here is a portion of the Olivet Discourse:

Matthew 24:1-22 (HCSB):

24 As Jesus left and was going out of the temple complex,  His disciples  came up and called His attention to the temple buildings. 2 Then He replied to them, “Don’t you see all these things? I assure you: Not one stone will be left here on another that will not be thrown down!”

3 While He was sitting on the •Mount of Olives, the disciples approached Him privately and said, “Tell us, when will these things happen? And what is the sign of Your coming and of the end of the age?”

4 Then Jesus replied to them: “Watch out that no one deceives  you.  5 For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the •Messiah,’ and they will deceive many.   6 You are going to hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, because these things must take place, but the end is not yet.  7 For nation will rise up against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines   and earthquakes in various places.   8 All these events are the beginning of birth pains.

9 “Then they will hand you over for persecution,  and they will kill you. You will be hated by all nations because of My name.   10 Then many will take offense, betray one another and hate one another.  11 Many false prophets  will rise up and deceive many.  12 Because lawlessness  will multiply, the love of many will grow cold.  13 But the one who endures to the end will be delivered.   14 This good news of the kingdom will be proclaimed in all the world  as a testimony to all nations.  And then the end will come.

15 “So when you see the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel,  standing in the holy place”  (let the reader understand ),  16 “then those in Judea must flee to the mountains!  17 A man on the housetop  must not come down to get things out of his house.   18 And a man in the field must not go back to get his clothes.  19 Woe to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days!  20 Pray that your escape may not be in winter or on a Sabbath.  21 For at that time there will be great tribulation,  the kind that hasn’t taken place from the beginning of the world until now and never will again!  22 Unless those days were limited, no one would  survive.  But those days will be limited because of the elect.

I’ve read this passage many times before, and even though Jesus’ words are ominous, I guess it feels rather abstract due to the mystery of it all. Woe to us if we take His words and warnings lightly! Luke 21:20-24 is a slightly more detailed picture of what was to happen to Jerusalem:

20 “When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies,  then recognize that its desolation  has come near.  21 Then those in Judea must flee  to the mountains!  Those inside the city  must leave it, and those who are in the country must not enter it,  22 because these are days of vengeance  to fulfill all the things that are written.  23 Woe to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days,  for there will be great distress in the land  and wrath against this people.  24 They will fall by the edge of the sword  and be led captive into all the nations, and Jerusalem will be trampled by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

And so, reading through the The Wars of the Jews by Josephus I was struck by something so horrifying about the siege of Jerusalem that it immediately made me refer back to what Jesus said in Matthew 24:19/Luke 21:23 (Woe to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days!). Josephus recounts this frightful episode where a starving mother actually kills and roasts her own baby for food. Here is an excerpt (The Wars of the Jews, Book 6, Chapter 3):

There was a certain woman that dwelt beyond Jordan, her name was Mary; her father was Eleazar, of the village Bethezub, which signifies the House of Hyssop. She was eminent for her family and her wealth, and had fled away to Jerusalem with the rest of the multitude, and was with them besieged therein at this time. (202) The other effects of this woman had been already seized upon; such I mean as she had brought with her out of Perea, and removed to the city. What she had treasured up besides, as also what food she had contrived to save, had been also carried off by the rapacious guards, who came every day running into her house for that purpose. (203) This put the poor woman into a very great passion, and by the frequent reproaches and imprecations she cast at these rapacious villains, she had provoked them to anger against her; (204) but none of them, either out of the indignation she had raised against herself, or out of the commiseration of her case, would take away her life; and if she found any food, she perceived her labors were for others, and not for herself; and it was now become impossible for her anyway to find anymore food, while the famine pierced through her very bowels and marrow, when also her passion was fired to a degree beyond the famine itself; nor did she consult with anything but with her passion and the necessity she was in. She then attempted a most unnatural thing; (205) and snatching up her son, who was a child sucking at her breast, she said, “O, thou miserable infant! For whom shall I preserve thee in this war, this famine, and this sedition? (206) As to the war with the Romans, if they preserve our lives, we must be slaves! This famine also will destroy us, even before that slavery comes upon us:—yet are these seditious rogues more terrible than both the other. (207) Come on; be thou my food, and be thou a fury to these seditious varlets and a byword to the world, which is all that is now wanting to complete the calamities of us Jews.” (208) As soon as she had said this she slew her son; and then roasted him, and ate the one half of him, and kept the other half by her concealed. (209) Upon this the seditous came in presently, and smelling the horrid scent of this food, they threatened her, that they would cut her throat immediately if she did not show them what food she had gotten ready. She replied, that she had saved a very fine portion of it for them; and withal uncovered what was left of her son. (210) Hereupon they were seized with a horror and amazement of mind, and stood astonished at the sight; when she said to them, “This is mine own son; and what hath been done was mine own doing! Come, eat of this food; for I have eaten of it myself! (211) Do not you pretend to be either more tender than a woman, or more compassionate than a mother; but if you be so scrupulous and do abominate this my sacrifice, as I have eaten the one half, let the rest be reserved for me also.” (212) After which, those men went out trembling, being never so much affrighted at anything as they were at this, and with some difficulty they left the rest of that meat to the mother. Upon which the whole city was full of this horrid action immediately; and while every body laid his miserable case before their own eyes, they trembled, as if this unheard-of action had been by themselves.

What a sad, horrifying picture of the tribulation that those in Jerusalem had to face. And again, what a horrifying type of what is to come before the end.

There are some other more general descriptions that Josephus gives us of the sacking of Jerusalem. The Wars of the Jews, Book 6, Chapter 1:

Thus did the miseries of Jerusalem grow worse and worse every day, and the seditious were still more irritated by the calamities they were under, even while the famine preyed upon themselves, after it had preyed upon the people. (2) And indeed the multitude of carcasses that lay in heaps one upon another, was a horrible sight, and produced a pestilential stench, which was a hindrance to those that would make sallies out of the city and fight the enemy: but as those were to go in battle-array, who had been already used to ten thousand murders, and must tread upon those dead bodies as they marched along, (3) so were not they terrified, or did they pity men as they marched over them; nor did they deem this affront offered to the deceased to be any ill omen to themselves; (4) but as they had their right hands already polluted with the murders of their own countrymen, and in that condition ran out to fight with foreigners, they seem to me to have cast a reproach upon God himself, as if he were too slow in punishing them; for the war was not now gone on with as if they had any hope of victory; for they gloried after a brutish manner in that despair of deliverance they were already in. (5) And now the Romans, although they were greatly distressed in getting together their materials, raised their banks in one-and-twenty days, after they had cut down all the trees that were in the country that adjoined to the city, and that for ninety furlongs round about, as I have already related. (6) And, truly, the very view itself of the country was a melancholy thing; for those places which were before adorned with trees and pleasant gardens were now become a desolate country every way, and its trees were all cut down: (7) nor could any foreigner that had formerly seen Judea and the most beautiful suburbs of the city, and now saw it as a desert, but lament and mourn sadly at so great a change; (8) for the war had laid all signs of beauty quite waste; nor, if anyone that had known the place before, had come on a sudden to it now, would he have known it again; but though he were at the city itself, yet would he have inquired for it notwithstanding.

Seeing the state of Judea must have been heart-breaking. The early Christians remaining in Judea would have recalled Jesus’ words in the Olivet Discourse and fled to the mountains. As for the abomination that causes desolation that Jesus and Daniel (hundreds of years before Jesus) spoke of, this is what Josephus writes:

(316) And now the Romans, upon the flight of the seditious into the city, and upon the burning of the holy house itself, and of all the buildings round about it, brought their ensigns to the temple, and set them over against its eastern gate; and there did they offer sacrifices to them, and there did they make Titus imperator, with the greatest acclamations of joy.

Thus Jesus’ words and those of Daniel before Him came to pass. Here’s what Daniel had to write about these things in Daniel 9:

26 After those 62 weeks the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing.
The people of the coming prince will destroy the city  and the sanctuary.
The  end will come with a flood, and until the end there will be  war;
desolations are decreed.
27 He will make a firm covenant with many for one week,
but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and offering.
And the abomination of desolation will be on a wing  of the temple
until the decreed destruction is poured out on the desolator.”

And as for Jesus saying that not one stone will remain of the temple? Here’s what Josephus records (The Wars of the Jews, Book 7):

Now, as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be objects of their fury (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other such work to be done) Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as were of the greatest eminency; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne, and so much of the wall as enclosed the city on the west side. (2) This wall was spared, in order to afford a camp for such as were to lie in garrison; as were the towers also spared, in order to demonstrate to posterity what kind of city it was, and how well fortified, which the Roman valor had subdued; (3) but for all the rest of the wall, it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited. (4) This was the end which Jerusalem came to by the madness of those that were for innovations; a city otherwise of great magnificence, and of mighty fame among all mankind.

So what do I take from all of this? One, that the Bible continues to prove itself trustworthy. That the words from the Lord that its Prophets give us come to pass. And therefore, we can trust what our Lord says will happen in the future. I’m constantly amazed by this.

Second, the Great Tribulation (when it comes) will not be pretty. The troubles we see in the world right now, are probably minor compared to what is to come. Just see what happened to Jerusalem. Read through Josephus’ accounts – they are not pretty. If that’s a prototype of what is to come, then the world is going to experience some deep, dark days, with suffering that is unprecedented.

Unfortunately, I also do not expect any sort of ‘secret rapture’ to take the ekklesia (Church) out of this world like Dispensationalists believe. I expect that the elect will be in this world (see Matt 24:22) in the midst of it. Just as the Church was present for the Tribulation in 70 A.D in Jerusalem, so will the Church be here for the Great Tribulation before He returns in power and glory. But the comforting thing is this – the Church will spend the rest of Eternity with the King once He emerges victorious against the presently evil world. And we will also spend it with redeemed resurrection bodies, in a New Heavens and New Earth, to reign with Him and praise Him forever and ever.

To Him be the Glory Forever! Amen.

Romans 5:12-21

Zampieri - Adam et Ève (détail)

“The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.” -Genesis 3:12 (Adam blames God and Eve for his own sin. So it begins!)

Sometimes I gloss over a passage of scripture, especially when I think to myself, “Yeah, I know this doctrine” and then find myself breezing over the text. Reading Systematic Theologies, learning doctrine, etc. can sometimes make me speed read through Scripture. I’m trying to be more deliberate as of late, and have been doing so in some passages of the theological masterpiece that is the book of Romans.

I was reading through Romans 5:12-21 and the lightbulb just suddenly clicked in my head the other day, and I thought I’d share it. Not only does Paul describe the doctrine of Original Sin in this passage, but he proves it and I’d forgotten how good Paul is at doing that. This is what I love about the epistles in the New Testament. It isn’t simply thus saith the Lord, but it treats us as thinking, rational adults and often seeks to show us why something is true.

In this passage, Paul will prove to us why it is that God counts us guilty in Adam even if we could somehow avoid transgressions against the Law. And he will prove it by showing us that once upon a time, there was a group of people who could avoid having their personal sins counted against them!

Romans 5:12-21

12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned—

13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.

15 But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many.

16 The gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment arose from one transgression resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification.

17 For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.

18 So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.

19 For as through the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous.

20 The Law came in so that the transgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,

21 so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Here is a summation of what Paul is saying. Remember, this is very important!

  1. Sin and death entered the world through Adam (v.12)
    1. Remember, the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). Death comes about due to sin.
    2. Adam was warned that death would come to him if he violated God’s commandment: If you eat of the fruit, you will surely die.
  2. However, sin cannot be imputed when there is no Law (v.13)
    1. Also see Romans 4:15: “for the Law brings about wrath, but where there is no law, there also is no violation
  3. Yet there was death between the time of Adam and the time of Moses! (v. 14)
    1. Note: The one law that was given to Adam and Eve could not be violated by their descendants, as their descendants could not eat the fruit. Therefore, their descendants could not sin in that fashion. And their other sins (murder, adultery, etc.) could not be held against them because the Law had not been given yet. And still, they died!
  4. We also note: the single transgression of Adam resulted in condemnation to all (v. 15)

Conclusion?

The conclusion one is left with is that in some sense mankind is held guilty in Adam even during the time period in which sin couldn’t be counted against us (before the Law of Moses). This is the doctrine of Original Sin. We are held guilty in some sense because of Adam, our forefather. That we share in his guilt even though we ourselves didn’t physically eat from the fruit!

To be fair, this is a hard doctrine for Western man to accept. Liberal Christianity seems to have abandoned it, or relegate it to the same pile of ‘unpleasantness’ as predestination, Hell, etc. But this is pretty clearly what Paul is teaching. This argument is buttressed even further with Paul’s comparison between Adam and Christ.

And in some ways, the most important part is the flip side of guilt in Adam. For, if condemnation came through the first Adam, and it brought death — a powerful force, then how much greater will the gift come to those who are in the Second Adam (Christ)!

Remember, this is the same formula used. If we are found in Christ, then His righteousness is imputed onto us (v. 17-19). And all we have to do is receive this free gift (16). One act of disobedience brought death (Adam). One act of obedience brought life (Christ).

So who represents you before God? Adam, or Christ?